PitchBook released its annual deep dive into venture secondaries this week, and it should be required reading for anyone participating in — or thinking about participating in — the private markets. Here's what stood out, what it means, and what the report doesn't say.

The big number: $106.3 billion. That's PitchBook's estimate for total U.S. venture secondary transaction value in 2025, combining $91.7 billion in direct secondaries with $14.6 billion in GP-led transactions. To put that in perspective, public listings generated $119.6 billion and acquisitions generated $140.7 billion in venture exit value over the same period. Secondaries are no longer a niche liquidity tool. They're approaching parity with the two traditional exit routes.

But the range tells the real story. PitchBook's estimate for direct secondaries alone spans $62.5 billion to $120.9 billion — a range wider than the entire global soap market, as Fortune’s Allie Garfinkle helpfully pointed out this week. That $58 billion gap exists because the secondary market remains structurally opaque. There are limited disclosure requirements, many deals happen through small brokerages or direct negotiations, and the biggest names distort everything. The range isn't a flaw in PitchBook's methodology. It's a feature of the market itself.

The report's most striking data point, in our view: on Hiive, the top 20 startups accounted for 86.4% of secondary trading value in Q4 2025. The top five alone — names like SpaceX and OpenAI — represented 55.6%.

That kind of concentration means the market is approaching a significant transition. If SpaceX, OpenAI, and Anthropic all go public in 2026 (as current reporting suggests they're planning to), a massive share of secondary volume vanishes overnight.

PitchBook argues this reshaping is healthy, not destructive — and the data backs them up. More IPOs mean better pricing benchmarks, tighter bid-ask spreads, and more investor confidence. On Caplight, 70 companies saw their first secondary trade in 2025, totaling $492 million. The market is starting to broaden. But for now, secondaries remain a top-heavy business. SpaceX was the most actively traded name on Augment in Q4 2025, accounting for 12.5% of total platform activity. OpenAI's $6.6 billion tender offer in October alone made up 6.2% of annual secondary transaction value.

The question for 2026 is whether the market can redistribute liquidity beyond this small group of elite names — or whether the post-IPO vacuum creates a temporary contraction before the next wave of companies fills the gap.

One of the report's clearest signals: every major financial institution is now racing to build or buy secondary market capabilities.

The list from the past few months alone is remarkable (and yes we’ve told you about some of these before, but not in this context): Goldman Sachs acquired Industry Ventures. Morgan Stanley acquired EquityZen. Charles Schwab acquired Forge Global. Nasdaq Private Market partnered with G Squared for priority access to tender offers. J.P. Morgan built a dedicated private capital team within its investment bank. Piper Sandler launched private markets trading after hiring senior talent from Forge.

These are billion-dollar acquisitions and strategic hires/tie-ups that signal where institutional capital thinks the market is heading. As PitchBook puts it: secondaries are now central to how capital is raised, allocated, and returned.

Stripe's announcement yesterday — a tender offer at a $159 billion valuation, up 49% from $106.7 billion just five months ago — is a perfect illustration of one of the report's key themes: company-led liquidity programs are becoming the norm, not the exception.

PitchBook cataloged 14 notable tender offers in 2025. SpaceX ran a $2.6 billion tender in December. OpenAI's $6.6 billion tender in October was the largest of the year. Ramp, Rippling, Whatnot, Notion, Vercel, ElevenLabs, Plaid — the list reads like a who's who of late-stage venture.

There's a straightforward logic here. Nearly half of today's unicorns (48.5%, per PitchBook) had their first VC round in 2016 or earlier. That means early employees and investors have been waiting a decade or more for liquidity. Regular tender offers solve the talent retention problem — employees don't need to leave for a public company to get paid — while giving startups more control over their cap tables than third-party secondary transactions provide.

Stripe is the clearest example of this model working at scale. Profitable, processing $1.9 trillion in payment volume, growing 34% year-over-year — and still no IPO plans. When co-founder John Collison says the company is in "no rush" to go public, it's because the private liquidity infrastructure now works well enough that going public is a choice, not a requirement.

The report shows venture secondary dry powder reached $11.8 billion as of mid-2025, up 2.8x from 2022. That growth is significant, but the context matters more: $11.8 billion still represents just 3.9% of the capital held by primary VC funds.

In other words, for every $100 that venture capital allocates to initial investments, less than $4 is earmarked for buying existing shares on the secondary market. The opportunity set is enormous relative to the capital currently targeting it.

New entrants are responding. Pinegrove Opportunity Partners closed a $2.2 billion debut venture secondary fund. Insight Partners hired from Industry Ventures to build its own secondaries strategy. StepStone's most recent fund hit $3.3 billion. The buyer base is expanding — but it's still early innings.

Not everything in the report is optimistic. PitchBook flags growing concerns around special purpose vehicles — the pooled investment structures that allow smaller investors to access pre-IPO shares. The typical secondary SPV on Sydecar in 2025 raised $930,000 from nine investors in just 16 days, charging 2% management fees and 10% carry.

As demand surged, so did complexity — and bad actors. Multilayered SPVs made it harder to trace actual share ownership. FINRA's 2026 oversight report flagged misrepresentation and disclosure failures. Linqto filed for bankruptcy. A Sestante Capital manager was indicted for fraud.

The implication: SPVs will persist, but startups are tightening the rules around who can form them and who can invest. Buyers need to scrutinize structures carefully — understanding information rights, fee layers, and whether the SPV can actually verify ownership of the underlying shares. Access is concentrating among established, trusted operators.

PitchBook's outlook can be summarized in one line: secondaries are moving from proving relevance to becoming embedded infrastructure.

The structural case is clear. Companies are staying private longer. Traditional exits remain constrained. Institutional capital is flooding in. AI, crypto, defense, and aerospace — sectors aligned with U.S. policy priorities — are capturing outsized secondary volume. AI startups see higher valuation step-ups at every funding stage compared to non-AI peers, which creates more paper gains and more incentive for employees and early investors to seek partial liquidity.

The open question is concentration. Can the market function efficiently when 86% of trading volume is in just 20 companies? What happens when several of those companies go public? PitchBook's data suggests the broadening has already started — but 2026 will be the real test.

That's venture secondary dry powder as a share of primary VC capital. For a market that traded over $100 billion last year, the dedicated buyer capital is still remarkably small relative to the opportunity — suggesting significant room for institutional expansion.

Source: PitchBook, as of June 2025

A secondary market transaction where a buyer agrees to purchase shares at a set price, but the actual transfer is contingent on a future event — typically the company's right of first refusal (ROFR) clearance or board approval. Forwards have grown as a share of secondary deal structures as more startups tighten transfer restrictions. For buyers, they offer price certainty in a volatile market. The risk: if the company blocks the transfer, the deal dies. Understanding whether a transaction is structured as a direct transfer, an SPV, or a forward contract is increasingly important as issuers assert more control over who ends up on their cap table.